Author(s):
Neetu Bhatnagar, Bharti Sharma, Sain Priya
Email(s):
bhartisharma7294@gmail.com , sainpriyaofficial123@gmail.com
DOI:
10.52711/2454-2660.2024.00048 
Address:
Neetu Bhatnagar1, Bharti Sharma2, Sain Priya3
1Assistant Professor, Department of Mental Health Nursing, Bee Enn Nursing Institute, Jammu.
2Assistant Professor, Department of Medical-Surgical Nursing, Bee Enn College of Nursing, Jammu.
3Associate professor, Department of Child Health Nursing, Bee Enn College of Nursing, Jammu.
*Corresponding Author
Published In:
Volume - 12,
Issue - 4,
Year - 2024
ABSTRACT:
Background: Nursing is a profession in which student after completing their training programme and provides best care to the patients. This training will shape the student’s future and make it bright. This Profession makes a student’s more decision maker, critical thinker and deal with daily ethical challenges. An important and simultaneously difficult aspect of good examination preparation is obtaining a properly trained and well-motivated group of assessors. To effectively recruit and maintain cooperation with assessors, it is worth knowing their opinion. The main aim of conducting this survey is to know the opinion of evaluators while evaluating. Objective: To assess the perception of evaluators while evaluating university theory answer sheets and to find out the association between the perception of evaluators with their selected demo-graphic variables. Method: A cross-sectional study was conducted using a questionnaire on evaluators who evaluate university theory answer sheets. This questionnaire consisted of 12 dichotomous questions about their perceptions. Purposive sampling technique was used to collect data. A total of 114 evaluators participated in this study. Descriptive and inferential statistics was used to find out the result. Finding: The Result showed that out of 114 evaluators, maximum 56.1% of evaluators were belongs to the age group of 31-40 years followed by 82.5% were females. Majority 93.9% were working in private area followed by 78.9% were qualified M.Sc (N). Majority 38.6% of evaluators were having 3 to7 years of experience. Majority of the evaluators has shown positive perception regarding all the aspects except the good or bad mood of the evaluator while checking the university theory answer sheets and checking previous theory sheet will affect the marking of the next answer sheets. Conclusion: The study concluded that the variables like age, gender, working area, qualification and years of experience were found to be statistically non-significant i.e., p<0.05.
Cite this article:
Neetu Bhatnagar, Bharti Sharma, Sain Priya. Perception of Evaluators While Evaluating University Theory Answer Sheets: Cross-Sectional Virtual Survey. International Journal of Nursing Education and Research. 2024;14(4):225-0. doi: 10.52711/2454-2660.2024.00048
Cite(Electronic):
Neetu Bhatnagar, Bharti Sharma, Sain Priya. Perception of Evaluators While Evaluating University Theory Answer Sheets: Cross-Sectional Virtual Survey. International Journal of Nursing Education and Research. 2024;14(4):225-0. doi: 10.52711/2454-2660.2024.00048 Available on: https://ijneronline.com/AbstractView.aspx?PID=2024-12-4-1
REFERENCES:
1. https://www.britannica.com/topic/perception
2. https://www.eklavvya.com/blog/challenges-answer-sheet-evaluation/
3. https://superteacher.co/blog/5-effective-ways-to-reduce-time-during-answer-sheet-evaluation-process
4. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED561139.pdf
5. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34924781/
6. https://journals.pan.pl/Content/118020/PDF/2020-02-FOMC-09-Stalmach-Przygoda-etal.pdf
7. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/43347428_Examiner_perceptions_of_a_portfolio_assessment_process
8. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/238399849_Exploring_the_Nature_of_Examiner_Thinking_during_the_Process_of_Examination_Marking/citation/download
9. Sarma G, John SK, Mathew T, Aiyagari V, Nair S, Parry GJ, Khadilkar S, Satishchandra P. Neurology Exit Examination System in India: A Survey of Examiners' Perceptions and Recommendations. Ann Indian Acad Neurol. 2022; 25(2): 189-193. doi: 10.4103/aian.aian_666_21. Epub 2022; Apr 6. PMID: 35693660; PMCID: PMC9175401.
10. Majumder MAA, Kumar A, Krishnamurthy K, Ojeh N, Adams OP, Sa B. An evaluative study of objective structured clinical examination (OSCE): students and examiners perspectives. Adv Med Educ Pract. 2019; 10: 387-397. doi: 10.2147/AMEP.S197275. PMID: 31239801; PMCID: PMC6556562.
11. A. K. Srinivas. The Evaluation of Self Help Groups- Bank Linkage Programme. Asian J. Management. 2010; 1(1): 30-32
12. Shailaja P. Yadav. Performance evaluation of public sector banks with reference to ‘CAMEL model’ for the period of 2006 – 2013. Asian J. Management. 2014; 5(4): 374-379
13. Mehrnoosh Pazargadi, Tahereh Ashktorab, Sharareh Khosravi. Nursing Students’ Experiences on the Evaluating Role of Their Clinical Educators: a Qualitative Study. Asian J. Nur. Edu. and Research. 2012; 2(3): 149-153.
14. Mamata Prasad. An evaluation of the quality of work life: A study of the public sector nurses in West Bengal. Asian J. Nur. Edu. and Research. 2016; 6(2): 199-203.
15. Smita Sunil Gawade. Students Evaluation of an Observed Structured Clinical Evaluation (OSCE) in Community Health Nursing Clinical Practice. Asian J. Nursing Education and Research. 2018; 8(2): 278-281.
16. Hanan Ramzy Ahmed Atalla, Gehan. H. Soliman, Warda Mohamed Henedy. Evaluation of Conservative Nursing Measures among Patients with Lower Limbs Varicose Vein. Asian J. Nursing Education and Research. 2019; 9(3): 449-459
17. Betcy George, Sheela Shenai N. A. Curriculum Evaluation - A Cross-Sectional Study under selected Nursing College of KUHS. Asian Journal of Nursing Education and Research. 2021; 11(4): 485-7.
18. Durai Anand Kumar, V. Balakrishnan. Corporate Social Responsibility: Evaluation of Existing Practices at UAE. Asian J. Management. 2011; 2(3): 108-114.
19. Audumbar Digambar Mali, Ritesh Bathe. An Updated Review on Formulation and Evaluation of Microsponge. Research J. Topical and Cosmetic Sci. 2015; 6(2): 77-85