ABSTRACT:
Background: Intravenous (IV) cannulation is a routine yet challenging nursing procedure, particularly among chemotherapy patients who often present with fragile or sclerosed veins. First-attempt failure in IV access not only delays treatment but also increases pain, anxiety, and risk of complications. Recent advances in artificial intelligence (AI)-enabled vein visualization devices offer a potential solution to improve success rates. However, clinical evidence comparing traditional manual methods with AI-guided cannulation in oncology settings remains limited in India. Aim: To simulate and compare the effectiveness of manual versus AI-assisted IV cannulation techniques in chemotherapy patients, focusing on first-attempt success, time taken, and patient comfort. Methods: This comparative simulation study was conducted using 10 hypothetical chemotherapy patient scenarios, each assessed through two approaches: manual IV cannulation and AI-enabled vein visualization-assisted technique. Parameters like number of pricks, time required for cannulation, and pain score (on a visual analog scale) were recorded for each method. The findings were tabulated and analyzed to assess comparative efficiency. Results: Simulated outcomes indicated a notable improvement in first-attempt success with AI-assisted techniques, alongside reduced time and lower pain scores. While the manual method showed variability across cases, the AI-based approach demonstrated consistent performance in locating viable veins even in difficult conditions. Conclusion: AI-enabled vein visualization may enhance the accuracy and efficiency of IV cannulation in chemotherapy patients. Although this simulation-based study does not reflect real clinical trials, the findings support the need for further practical research and suggest potential adoption in high-dependency nursing settings.
Cite this article:
Poulami Das. Comparison of Manual and AI-Assisted IV Cannulation Techniques among Chemotherapy Patients: A Comparative Simulation Study. International Journal of Nursing Education and Research. 2025;13(4):275-8. doi: 10.52711/2454-2660.2025.00055
Cite(Electronic):
Poulami Das. Comparison of Manual and AI-Assisted IV Cannulation Techniques among Chemotherapy Patients: A Comparative Simulation Study. International Journal of Nursing Education and Research. 2025;13(4):275-8. doi: 10.52711/2454-2660.2025.00055 Available on: https://ijneronline.com/AbstractView.aspx?PID=2025-13-4-13
REFERANCES:
1. Sabri A et al. Failed attempts and improvement strategies in peripheral intravenous access: A review. J Vasc Access. 2016; 17(2): 103–10.
2. Sharma S et al. Patient pain and distress during IV cannulation: A comparative evaluation. Nurs J India. 2020; 111(6): 256–9.
3. Whitehead S et al. Improving peripheral intravenous cannulation with infrared technology. British Journal of Nursing. 2020; 29(15): S20–5.
4. Smereka J et al. Infrared devices in difficult IV access: a new opportunity for nurses. Crit Care Nurs Clin North Am. 2019; 31(4): 537–46.
5. Bose R et al. Clinical outcomes of vein visualization technologies in pediatric and adult populations. Asian J Clin Nurs. 2023; 8(1): 15–20.
6. Gopal N, Ganapathy S. Role of simulation in improving IV cannulation success rate among nursing students. Int J Nurs Educ Res. 2021; 9(3): 227–30. doi:10.5958/2454-2660.2021.00052.7